Abstract
Purpose. The perishable nature of the horticulture (fruits, vegetables, and flowers) industry makes it more complex to study. The higher return and nutritional benefits compared to traditional agricultural products expand the research scope for the stakeholders’ sustainable benefit. Nevertheless, despite limited research, this study explicitly examines additional facets of smallholder development beyond the traditional economic, social, and environmental dimensions.
Methodology / approach. To fill this knowledge gap, we comprehensively reviewed 73 articles published between 2013 and 2022 in international scientific journals with an SJR (Scimago Journal & Country Rank) Q1 ranking. We followed the “Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews” (SPAR-4-SLR) protocol to identify different aspects of smallholders’ development. Literature from Web of Science and Scopus databases was analysed and organised using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Methodology) framework.
Results. The study identified important factors like infrastructure, commercialisation, market access, marketing, credit, policies, information, intervention, training, technology, and collaboration that could uncover crucial economic, political, social, psychological, ecological, cultural, physical and nutritional aspects of development in general. The study also suggests that implementation Agriculture 4.0 through advanced technologies like IoT, AI, and vertical and bio-fortification practices can help in sustainable livelihood development in horticulture.
Originality / scientific novelty. The limited or lack of comprehensive studies on smallholders’ sustainable livelihood development with different dimensions makes this research a bridge to identify other dimensions instead of only focusing on the horticultural sector’s economic, social, and ecological aspects. It uses the Agricultural Innovation System and Farmer First theories, stating that the farmer is the first priority and must collaborate and interact to implement technology and innovations for smallholder livelihood development.
Practical value / implications. This research will help in decision-making regarding smallholders’ livelihoods in all eight dimensions at all levels of government, private and other stakeholders, suggesting a triple-helix model.
Publisher
Institute of Eastern European Research and Consulting
Reference148 articles.
1. Abiri, R., Rizan, N., Balasundram, S. K., Shahbazi, A. B., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2023). Application of digital technologies for ensuring agricultural productivity. Heliyon, 9(12), e22601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22601.
2. Acheampong, D., Balana, B. B., Nimoh, F., & Abaidoo, R. C. (2018). Asssesing the effectiveness and impact of agricultural water management interventions: the case of small reservoirs in northern Ghana. Agricultural Water Management, 209, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.009.
3. Achieng, M. S. (2023). Traditional farming knowledge should be stored for future use: the technology to do this is available. The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/traditional-farming-knowledge-should-be-stored-for-future-use-the-technology-to-do-this-is-available-213682#:~:text.
4. Adam, Y. O., Pretzsch, J., & Pettenella, D. (2013). Contribution of non-timber forest products livelihood strategies to rural development in drylands of Sudan: potentials and failures. Agricultural Systems, 117, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.008.
5. Adebiyi, J. A., Olabisi, L. S., Liu, L., & Jordan, D. (2021). Water – food – energy – climate nexus and technology productivity: a Nigerian case study of organic leafy vegetable production. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 6128–6147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00865-0.