Learning styles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine personnel undergoing English language courses

Author:

Duzhyi Roman V.ORCID,Derkach Tetiana M.ORCID

Abstract

The preferred learning styles according to the Felder-Soloman method of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with various military ranks studying English on four-month face-to-face foreign language courses based on the Foreign Languages Education and Research Center of the National Defense University of Ukraine were studied. Active, sensing and visual styles account for approximately 85% of students, while the remaining 15% have reflective, intuitive and verbal styles. The advantage of the sequential over global style is about 75%. No correlation was found between individual learning preferences, the results of the English language entrance test (four tests - listening, writing, reading and speaking), and officer ranks. The method of two-stage cluster analysis shows that respondents form two clusters (Silhouette cluster quality - 0.5-0.6) of approximately the same size according to the level of language proficiency. The most influential factor for cluster formation is the results of listening. Military personnel learning styles were compared with literature data on students' learning styles from 12 fields of study. Two fields (military and natural sciences) demonstrate the preferences toward four styles in all four dimensions; preferences in 2 directions (sensing and visual) and balance in the other two are characteristic of six fields of study. Four other studied fields have a propensity in only one dimension (visual perception of information).

Publisher

Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences

Reference48 articles.

1. A Psychometric Analysis of Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles (ILS)

2. The Relationship between the Saudi Cadets’ Learning Motivation and Their Vocabulary Knowledge

3. The Relationship between Saudi Cadets’ Willingness to Communicate and Their English Language Proficiency

4. A Survey of Learning Styles of Engineering Students

5. Bachmann, C., 2011. Using Learning Styles as a Group Selection Technique. In: N. Callaos, J.V. Carrasquero, J.M. Fuentes, A. Oropeza, A. Tremante and F. Welsch, eds. Proceedings of 5th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics (IMSCI 2011). IIIS, Orlando, FL, US, vol. 2, pp.2–12. Available from: https://westpoint.edu/sites/default/files/inline-images/centers_research/center_for_teching_excellence/PDFs/mtp_project_papers/Bachmann_10.pdf.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3