Evaluation of Precision Statements for Physio-mechanical Characterization Tests on GFRP Bars

Author:

Vega Camilo1ORCID,Zahoor Yameen2,Palacios Juan2,De Caso Francisco2,Nanni Antonio2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Miami 1 , 1251 Memorial Dr., McArthur Engineering Building, Coral Gables, FL33146, USA (Corresponding author), e-mail: cjv55@miami.edu , ORCID link for author moved to before name tags https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9804-9379

2. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Miami 2 , 1251 Memorial Dr., McArthur Engineering Building, Coral Gables, FL33146, USA , https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-7819 (F.D.C.), https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2678-9268 (A.N.)

Abstract

Abstract Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars are composite materials that, in the field of civil engineering, serve as an alternative for the internal steel reinforcement of concrete structures. The study and development of these material systems in construction are relatively new, requiring targeted research and development to achieve greater adoption. In this scenario, research and standardization play crucial roles. The development and publication of new test methods, material specifications, and other standards, as well as the improvement of the existing ones, allow for quality control, validation, and acceptance. One of these improvements is the evaluation of precision statements of the different ASTM standards related to the physical-mechanical and durability characterization of GFRP bars used as internal concrete reinforcement. Precision refers to how closely test results obtained under specific conditions agree with each other. A precision statement allows potential users to assess the test method’s general suitability for their intended applications. It should provide guidance on the type of variation that can be expected between test results when the method is used in one or more competent laboratories. The present study aims to enhance the precision statements in ASTM standards pertaining to the geometric, material, mechanical, and physical properties required for GFRP bars in concrete reinforcement, including ASTM standards like ASTM D7205M-21, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars; ASTM D7617M-11(2017), Standard Test Method for Transverse Shear Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars; and ASTM D7913M-14(2020), Standard Test Method for Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars to Concrete by Pullout Testing, while in accordance with the statistical procedures and calculation methods outlined in ASTM Practices ASTM E177-20, Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods, and ASTM E691-22, Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method.

Publisher

ASTM International

Reference27 articles.

1. State of the Practice of FRP Composites in Highway Bridges;Kim;Engineering Structures,2019

2. Effect of Marine Environmental Conditions on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Composites—A Review;Mayya;Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series C,2021

3. Claure G. G. , “Non-traditional Shape GFRP Rebars for Concrete Reinforcement” (PhD diss., University of Miami, 2015).

4. Durability Issues of FRP Rebars in Reinforced Concrete Members;Ceroni;Cement and Concrete Composites,2006

5. Physical, Mechanical, and Durability Characteristics of Newly Developed Thermoplastic GFRP Bars for Reinforcing Concrete Structures;Benmokrane;Construction and Building Materials,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3