Abstract
It is a customary practice to carry out standardless elemental microanalysis by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) under the very same operational conditions as those used for scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. In this article, EDS experiments were carried out with stainless steel (SS), varying the EDS testing operating conditions. The results showed that, if X-ray spectra are acquired under operating conditions that are very dissimilar to those optimized for microanalysis, both the detectability limit of minor species (Si, Mo, and Mn) and the uncertainty in the concentration of major alloying elements (Cr and Ni) are noticeably impaired. It was observed that, by improving the signal-to-noise (S-to-N) ratio (i.e., by increasing the accelerating voltage, beam intensity, and total acquisition time, or when the working distance is optimized), the precision of the elemental concentration increases, but the accuracy is only marginally affected. For the major alloying elements, 25% of the measurements showed a percent discrepancy higher than three times the standard deviation, which is inconsistent with a normal statistical distribution.
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Subject
General Engineering,Building and Construction
Reference17 articles.
1. Burgess S., Li X., and Holland J. (2013). High spatial resolution energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry in the SEM and the de-tection of light elements including lithium. Microscopy and Analysis 27(4) S8-S13. https://analyticalscience.wiley.com/do/10.1002/micro.620/full/id0f755c16020bfdbfe4de8804e569337.pdf
2. Carlton, R. (2009). Comparison of SiLi and SDD Detectors for Pharmaceutical Applications. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 15(S2), 382-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927609096731
3. Çubukçu H. E., Ersoy O, Ayudar E., and Çakir U. (2008). WDS versus silicon drift detector EDS: A case report for the com-parison of quantitative chemical analyses of natural silicate minerals. Micron, 39(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2006.11.004
4. Franchi G., Angulo J., Moreaud M., and Sorbier I. (2017). En-hanced EDX images by fusion of multimodal SEM images using pansharpening techniques. Journal of Microscopy, 269(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12612
5. Gernet U. (2008, September 1-5). Comparing the Si(Li)-detector and the silicon drift detector (SDD) using EDX in SEM [Confer-ence presentation]. EMC 2008 14th European Microscopy Congress, Aachen, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85156-1_349