Determinants of cyclists’ willingness to comply with mixed traffic provision and to ride on the carriageway rather than the pavement

Author:

Hantschel SebastianORCID,Schröter BettinaORCID,Gerike RegineORCID

Abstract

Stakeholders in many municipalities worldwide are committed to promoting cycling and improving cycling provision. Scarcity of space is a major issue in most of these cities, particularly for main streets with significant movement and place functions. Multiple demands exist on these streets, including moving pedestrians, cyclists, motorised vehicles, parking, people waiting at public transport stops, or staying in the street for place activities. Mixing cyclists and motorised vehicles in the same space in the carriageway might be the only possible solution for cycling provision in these contexts, which is applied in many German cities.The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptance of cycling in mixed traffic, which we measure as the proportion of cyclists riding on the carriageway versus on the pavement. The empirical work in this study is based on video observations at 273 study sites with a total length of 124 km located in 13 cities in Germany. 260 of these study sites have no marking for cyclists, and 13 have bicycle pictograms. A total of 34 874 cyclists are recorded at these study sites. A logistic regression model is used to quantify the effect of exposure and infrastructure characteristics on the proportion of cyclists on the carriageway. Volumes of motorised vehicles, lane widths > 3.00 m and city type show a significant negative effect on the acceptance of cycling on the carriageway. Cyclist volumes, bicycle pictograms, and a speed limit < 50 km/h significantly increase the likelihood of cycling on the carriageway. The model is then applied to develop evidence-based recommendations on appropriate conditions for mixed traffic provision for cyclists, ensuring pre-defined levels of acceptability. Cycling in mixed traffic without bicycle pictograms should only be recommended with traffic volumes of a maximum of 400 vehicles per hour and a speed limit of < 50 km/h to achieve a proportion of cyclists on the carriageway of 90%. The marking of bicycle pictograms increases acceptance.

Publisher

Dept. of Technology & Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University

Reference45 articles.

1. AASHTO, (2012), Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, (Washington, US: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) https://store.transportation.org/Item/CollectionDetail?ID=116.

2. Alrutz, D., W. Bohle, R. Maier, M. Enke, M. Pohle, F. Zimmermann, J. Ortlepp, M. Schreiber (2015), 'Einfluss von Radverkehrsaufkommen und Radverkehrsinfrastruktur auf das Unfallgeschehen [Influence of bicycle traffic volume and bicycle infrastructure on accidents]', Unfallforschung der Versicherer, Forschungsbericht Nr. 29, https://www.udv.de/resource/blob/79750/0e566dd0c17f5caa0239f10934eb7a85/29-einfluss-von-radverkehrsaufkommen-und-radverkehrsinfrastruktur-auf-das-unfallgeschehen-data.pdf.

3. Alrutz, D., W. Bohle, H. Müller, H. Prahlow (2009), 'Unfallrisiko, Konfliktpotenzial und Akzeptanz der Verkehrsregelungen von Fahrradfahrern [Accident risk, conflict potential and acceptance of traffic regulations by cyclists]', BAST, Bericht zum Forschungsprojekt FE 82.262, https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-bast/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/191/file/V184.pdf.

4. Andersen, T., F. Bredal, M. Weinreich, N. Jensen, M. Riisgaard-Dam, M. Kofod Nielsen (2012), 'Collection of cycle concepts 2012', Cycling Embassy of Denmark, https://bicycleinfrastructuremanuals.com/manuals1/Collection-of-Cycle-Concepts-2012_Denmark.pdf.

5. Austroads, (2017), Cycling Aspects of Austroads Guides, (Sydney, Australia: Austroads) https://​austroads.com.au​/​publications/​road-​design/​ap-​g88-​17.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3