Abstract
BACKGROUND: Workers, including those in the healthcare industry, are exposed to occupational hazards that interfere with the health-disease process, negatively impacting their physical,[1] mental, and social health. [2] High blood pressure (HBP) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality of people in full productive capacity.[3] It is possible to assume that hypertensive patients who work in hospitals are more aware of the causes and complications related to hypertension, as well as about ways of prevention and treatment. Despite this assumption, there is a scarcity of studies looking at the level of adherence of Filipino healthcare workers in taking their antihypertensive medication OBJECTIVE: The study assessed antihypertensive treatment adherence and associated factors in healthcare workers from Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective analytic study design, consisting of 250 workers who self-reported as being hypertensive. Associations between sociodemographic, work, and health variables were assessed regarding adherence. The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8) was chosen for the study. RESULTS: Sixty % of participants were classified as controlled hypertensive patients, with 60% taking ARBs and 55.20% taking CCBs; from these, 84.80% of workers adhered to medication treatment. Adherence to pharmacological treatment has no significant association with BP control (p >.05). "Missing medical appointments" presented a statistically significant association with non-adherence to treatment. There was a greater chance (OR=5.85; p=0.005) of professionals who missed medical appointments not adhering to treatment, compared to those who reported not missing them. CONCLUSIONS: The main factors for non-adherence to treatment by workers were the presence of antihypertensive treatment disruption and missing medical appointments. Since hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases are asymptomatic diseases that require continuous treatment, hypertensive patients have difficulties understanding the importance of adhering to treatment.
Reference58 articles.
1. Costa BR, Vieira RE. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med[Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Feb 16]; 53:285-323. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.20750/pdf
2. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M. Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occupat Med[Internet]. 2010 [cited 2017 Feb 15]; 60:277-86. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqq081
3. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Hipertensão. Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. VI Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial. Arq Bras Cardiol[Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Feb 03];95 (Supl.1):1-51. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abc/v95n1s1/v95n1s1.pdf
4. Eugene B, editor. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co.; 1997. p. 807.
5. Robert OB, editor. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012. p. 935.