The Ontic Probability Interpretation of Quantum Theory – Part III

Author:

Alba-Juez FelixORCID

Abstract

Most of us are either philosophically naïve scientists or scientifically naïve philosophers, so we misjudged Schrödinger’s “very burlesque” portrait of Quantum Theory (QT) as a profound conundrum. The clear signs of a strawman argument were ignored. The Ontic Probability Interpretation (TOPI) is a metatheory: a theory about the meaning of QT. Ironically, equating Reality with Actuality cannot explain actual data, justifying the century-long philosophical struggle. The actual is real but not everything real is actual. The ontic character of the Probable has been elusive for so long because it cannot be grasped directly from experiment; it can only be inferred from physical setups that do not morph it into the Actual. In this Part III, Born’s Rule and the quantum formalism for the microworld are intuitively surmised from instances in our macroworld. The posited reality of the quanton’s probable states and properties is probed and proved. After almost a century, TOPI aims at setting the record straight: the so-called ‘Basis’ and ‘Measurement’ problems are ill-advised. About the first, all bases are legitimate regardless of state and milieu. As for the second, its premise is false: there is no need for a physical ‘collapse’ process that would convert many states into a single state. Under TOPI, a more sensible variant of the ‘measurement problem’ can be reformulated in non-anthropic terms as a real problem. Yet, as such, it is not part of QT per se and will be tackled in future papers. As for the mythical cat, the ontic state of a radioactive nucleus is not pure, so its evolution is not governed by Schrödinger’s equation – let alone the rest of his “hellish machine”. Einstein was right: “The Lord is subtle but not malicious”. However, ‘The Lord’ turned out to be much subtler than what Einstein and Schrödinger could have ever accepted. Part IV introduces QR/TOPI: a new theory that solves the century-old problem of integrating Special Relativity with Quantum Theory [1].

Publisher

Qeios Ltd

Reference89 articles.

1. F. Alba-Juez, "The Ontic Probability Interpretation of Quantum Theory - Part IV - QR/TOPI: How to Complete Special Relativity and Merge it with Quantum Theory," 2024. [Online]. Available: TBD.

2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?," Physical Review, vol. 47, pp. 777-780, 1935.

3. F. Alba-Juez, Elements of REALITY - 1925-1935: The Onset of an Unfinished Philosophical Struggle, Saint George, Utah: Felix Alba-Juez, Publisher, 2019.

4. F. Alba-Juez, "The Ontic Probability Interpretation of Quantum Theory - Part I - The Meaning of Einstein's Incompleteness Claim," 5 February 2020. [Online]. Available: https://philpapers.org/rec/ALBTOP-2.

5. F. Alba-Juez, "The Ontic Probability Interpretation of Quantum Theory - Part II - Einstein's Incompleteness/Nonlocality Dilemma," 5 February 2020. [Online]. Available: https://philpapers.org/rec/ALBTOP.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3