The importance of multigeneration host specificity testing: rejection of a potential biocontrol agent of Nymphaea mexicana (Nymphaeaceae) in South Africa
Author:
Reid Megan K.12ORCID, Coetzee Julie A.34, Gettys Lyn A.2, Hill Martin P.1
Affiliation:
1. Centre for Biological Control, Department of Zoology and Entomology , Rhodes University , Makhanda , Eastern Cape 6140 , South Africa 2. Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center , 59100 University of Florida , 3205 College Avenue , Davie , FL 33314 , USA 3. Centre for Biological Control, Department of Botany , Rhodes University , Makhanda , Eastern Cape 6140 , South Africa 4. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity , Makhanda , Eastern Cape 6140 , South Africa
Abstract
Abstract
Classical biological control utilizes natural enemies of invasive non-native plants imported from their native range to manage problematic populations. However, a potential biological control agent must undergo strict host specificity tests to ensure that it does not feed on species native to the invaded range. Nymphaea mexicana Zucc. (Nymphaeaceae) is an invasive waterlily in South Africa that is native to the southern USA and parts of Mexico and is a target for biological control in South Africa. The planthopper, Megamelus toddi Beamer (Hemiptera: Delphacidae), is a potential biological control agent that was imported from Florida, USA for host specificity tests under quarantine conditions. Survival and multigeneration trials were carried out to determine the ability of M. toddi to survive and reproduce on its original host, N. mexicana, as well as Nymphaea nouchali Bur. fil., a waterlily native to South Africa, and Nymphaea marliacea var. chromatella Lat.-Marl., a hybrid of N. mexicana. M. toddi was unable to survive for more than two generations on the hybrid but completed three generations on N. nouchali and N. mexicana, indicating that M. toddi is unsafe for use as a biological control agent in South Africa. Nevertheless, the results from this study contribute information about a species that has not been thoroughly studied and emphasizes the importance of conducting thorough host specificity tests before releasing potential biological control agents.
Funder
South African Agency for Science and Technology Advancement Department of Environmental Affairs Tiso Foundation Rhodes University Research Council
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference50 articles.
1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Software 67: 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01. 2. Briese, D.T. (2003). The centrifugal phylogenetic method used to select plants for host-specificity testing of weed biological control agents: can and should it be modernised? In: Spafford Jacob, H., and Briese, D.T. (Eds.). Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents. CRC for Australian Weed Management Technical Series no. 7, Perth, Australia, pp. 23–33. 3. Briese, D.T. (2005). Translating host-specificity test results into the real world: the need to harmonize the yin and yang of current testing procedures. Biol. Control 35: 208–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.02.001. 4. Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., Van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H.J., Machler, M., and Bolker, B.M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9: 378–400, https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2017-066. 5. Coetzee, J., Byrne, M., and Hill, M. (2003). Failure of Eccritotarsus catarinensis, a biological control agent of waterhyacinth, to persist on pickerelweed, a non-target host in South Africa, after forced establishment. Biol. Control 28: 229–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1049-9644(03)00090-2.
|
|