Interlaboratory comparison study of immunosuppressant analysis using a fully automated LC-MS/MS system

Abstract

Abstract Objectives All guidelines recommend LC-MS/MS as the analytical method of choice for the quantification of immunosuppressants in whole blood. Until now, the lack of harmonization of methods and the complexity of the analytical technique have prevented its widespread use in clinical laboratories. This can be seen in international proficiency schemes, where more than half of the participants used immunoassays. With the Cascadion SM Clinical analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oy, Vantaa, FI) a fully automated LC-MS/MS system has been introduced, which enables the use of LC-MS/MS without being an expert in mass spectrometry. Methods To verify the interlaboratory comparison of the immunosuppressant assay on this type of instrument, three centers across Europe compared 1097 routine whole blood samples, each site sharing its own samples with the other two. In other experiments, the effects of freezing and thawing of whole blood samples was studied, and the use of secondary cups instead of primary tubes was assessed. Results In the Bland–Altman plot, the comparison of the results of tacrolimus in fresh and frozen samples had an average bias of only 0.36%. The respective data for the comparison between the primary and secondary tubes had an average bias of 1.14%. The correlation coefficients for patient samples with cyclosporine A (n=411), everolimus (n=139), sirolimus (n=114) and tacrolimus (n=433) were 0.993, 0.993, 0.993 and 0.990, respectively. Conclusions The outcome of this study demonstrates a new level of result harmonization for LC-MS/MS based immunosuppressant analysis with a commercially available fully automated platform for routine clinical application.