Affiliation:
1. Danish School of Education, Aarhus University , 8000 Aarhus C , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Following ethnographic studies of Danish companies, this article examines how small- and medium-sized companies are implementing cobots into their manufacturing systems and considers how this is changing the practices of technicians and operators alike. It considers how this changes human values and has ethical consequences for the companies involved. By presenting a range of dilemmas arising during emergent processes, it raises questions about the extent to which ethics can be regulated and predetermined in processes of robot implementation and the resulting reconfiguration of work.
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference64 articles.
1. M. Faccio, R. Minto, G. Rosati, and M. Bottin, “The influence of the product characteristics on human-robot collaboration: a model for the performance of collaborative robotic assembly,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 106, no. 5–6, pp. 2317–2331, 2020.
2. V. Villani, F. Pini, F. Leali, and C. Secchi, “Survey on human-robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications,” Mechatronics (Oxf.), vol. 55, pp. 248–266, 2018.
3. L. Probst, L. Frideres, B. Pedersen, and C. Caputi, Service Innovation for Smart Industry: Human-robot Collaboration, Luxembourg: European Commission, 2015.
4. IFR, Executive Summary World Robotics, 2017.
5. M. Dalle Mura and G. Dini, “Designing assembly lines with humans and collaborative robots: A genetic approach,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2019.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献