Affiliation:
1. The Bartlett School of Environment, Energy & Resources, University College London , London WC1E 6BT , United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
A multi-level perspective of how environmental regulations affect firm performance receives less attention. By document analysis and semi-structured interviews, this study examines the influences of environmental regulations from the central government, the local governments, and the corporate on firm performance with a case study based on a state-owned enterprise named SINOPEC Yangzi Petrochemical Company (SYPC) in China. The findings show that the regulations from different levels exert distinct but interconnected influences on performance of SYPC. The guiding concepts from the central government, the prescriptive standards from the local governments, and the performance management systems from the SINOPEC headquarters incentivize SYPC to innovate green technology. Technical upgrade, good relations with the government, and popularity in the public due to the implementation of regulations improve economic performance of SYPC, though which is not the priority of the company. SYPC actively implements environmental policies but also acts as a part of the strategy of SINOPEC circumventing regulations.
Reference47 articles.
1. Arimura, T., Hibiki, A., & Johnstone, N. (2007). An empirical study of environmental R&D: What encourages facilities to be environmentally innovative. In Nick Johnstone (Ed.), Environmental policy and corporate behaviour (pp. 142–173). Edward Elgar Publishing.
2. Broadman, H. G. (2001). The business(es) of the Chinese state. World Economy, 24(7), 849–875.
3. Cai, X., Zhu, B., Zhang, H., Li, L., & Xie, M. (2020). Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Science of the Total Environment, 746, 140810.
4. Christiansen, H. (2011). The size and composition of the SOE sector in OECD countries. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers (Vol. 5). Paris: OECD Corporate Affairs Division.
5. DeCanio, S. J. (1998). The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy, 26(5), 441–454.