Affiliation:
1. National Cheng Kung University , Tainan , 70101 , Taiwan
2. National Pingtung University , Pingtung , Taiwan
Abstract
Abstract
For non-inferiority/superiority and equivalence tests of two Poisson rates, the determination of the required number of sample sizes has been studied but the studies for the number of events to be observed are very limited. To fill the gap, the present study first is aimed toward determining the number of events to be observed for testing non-inferiority/superiority and equivalence of two Poisson rates, respectively. Also, considering the cost for each event, the second purpose is to apply an exhaustive search to find the unequal but optimal allocation of events for each group such that the budget is minimal for a user-specified power level, or the statistical power is maximal for a user-specified budget. Four R Shiny apps were developed to obtain the number of events needed for each group. A simulation study showed the proposed approach to be valid in terms of Type I error and statistical power. A comparison of the proposed approach with extant methods from various disciplines was performed, and an illustrative example of comparing the adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines was demonstrated. By applying the proposed approach, researchers also can estimate the most economical number of subjects or time intervals after determining the number of events.
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,General Medicine,Statistics and Probability
Reference59 articles.
1. Graham, PL, Mengersen, K, Morton, AP. Confidence limits for the ratio of two rates based on likelihood scores: non-iterative method. Stat Med 2003;22:2071–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1405.
2. Krishnamoorthy, K, Thomson, J. A more powerful test for comparing two Poisson means. J Stat Plann Inference 2004;119:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00408-1.
3. Liu, G. Sample size for epidemiologic studies. In: Gail, M, Benichou, J, editors. Encyclopedia of epidemiologic methods. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2000:777–94 pp.
4. Nelson, LS. Comparison of Poisson means: the general case. J Qual Technol 1987;19:173–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1987.11979062.
5. Kikuchi, T, Gittins, J. A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups. Stat Methods Med Res 2011;20:389–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280209358131.