Affiliation:
1. School of Politics, Public Affairs, and International Studies, University of Wyoming , Laramie, WY 82071 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Midterm congressional elections are referenda on the president not by happenstance but by design, as the opposition party and its candidates attack the administration when political conditions provide the opportunity. Models for explaining and predicting the number of seats won by the president’s party incorporating the number of seats held before the election, prior election results, change in status of the economy, and presidential evaluation data conditioned by strategy of the opposition party are presented. These models improve upon traditional models of midterm election explanations and predictions, providing parsimonious, theory-driven, and accurate models of midterm election outcomes.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Reference82 articles.
1. Abramowitz, Alan I. 1985. “Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47 (February): 31–43.
2. Abramowitz, Alan I. 1995. “The End of the Democratic Era? 1994 and the Future of Congressional Election Research.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (December): 873–889.
3. Abramowitz, Alan I. 2001. “It’s Monica, Stupid: The Impeachment Controversy and the 1998 Midterm Election.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (May): 211–226.
4. Abramowitz, Alan I. 2006. “Using the Generic Ballot to Forecast the 2006 House and Senate Elections.” The Forum 4 (#2), article 3.
5. Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. “How Large a Wave? Using the Generic Ballot to Forecast the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (October): 631–632.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献