Automated diagnosis of autism with artificial intelligence: State of the art

Author:

Valizadeh Amir1ORCID,Moassefi Mana1ORCID,Nakhostin-Ansari Amin2ORCID,Heidari Some’eh Soheil23ORCID,Hosseini-Asl Hossein23ORCID,Saghab Torbati Mehrnush4ORCID,Aghajani Reyhaneh23ORCID,Maleki Ghorbani Zahra23ORCID,Menbari-Oskouie Iman2ORCID,Aghajani Faezeh25ORCID,Mirzamohamadi Alireza23ORCID,Ghafouri Mohammad2ORCID,Faghani Shahriar67ORCID,Memari Amir Hossein2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , PO: 1419733141 , Tehran , Iran

2. Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , PO: 14395578 , Tehran , Iran

3. Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , PO: 1417755331 , Tehran , Iran

4. Islamic Azad University of Zahedan , PO: 9816743545 , Zahedan , Iran

5. Research Development Center, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , PO: 14695542 , Tehran , Iran

6. Shariati Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences , PO: 1411713135 , Tehran , Iran

7. Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Research Program (INRP), Tehran University of Medical Sciences , PO: 1416634793 , Tehran , Iran

Abstract

Abstract Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a panel of conditions that begin during the developmental period and result in impairments of personal, social, academic, or occupational functioning. Early diagnosis is directly related to a better prognosis. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of ASD requires a long and exhausting subjective process. We aimed to review the state of the art for automated autism diagnosis and recognition in this research. In February 2022, we searched multiple databases and sources of gray literature for eligible studies. We used an adapted version of the QUADAS-2 tool to assess the risk of bias in the studies. A brief report of the methods and results of each study is presented. Data were synthesized for each modality separately using the Split Component Synthesis (SCS) method. We assessed heterogeneity using the I 2 statistics and evaluated publication bias using trim and fill tests combined with ln DOR. Confidence in cumulative evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach for diagnostic studies. We included 344 studies from 186,020 participants (51,129 are estimated to be unique) for nine different modalities in this review, from which 232 reported sufficient data for meta-analysis. The area under the curve was in the range of 0.71–0.90 for all the modalities. The studies on EEG data provided the best accuracy, with the area under the curve ranging between 0.85 and 0.93. We found that the literature is rife with bias and methodological/reporting flaws. Recommendations are provided for future research to provide better studies and fill in the current knowledge gaps.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3