If You’re Not First, You’re Last: Are the Empirical Premises Correct in the Ethics of Anti-Doping?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

If You’re Not First, You’re Last: Are the Empirical Premises Correct in the Ethics of Anti-Doping?

Published:2020-09-14 Issue:4 Volume:15 Page:495-506
ISSN:1751-1321
Container-title:Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
language:en
Short-container-title:Sport, Ethics and Philosophy

Author:

Pitsch Werner¹,Gleaves John²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sports Economics and Sports Sociology, Sports Science Institute, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

2. Department of Kinesiology, Co-Director for the Center for Sociocultural Sport and Olympic Research, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Philosophy,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17511321.2020.1818277

Reference27 articles.

1. Use of isotope ratio mass spectrometry to detect doping with oral testosterone undecanoate: Inter-individual variability of 13C/12C ratio

2. How to justify a ban on doping?

3. The ethics of blood testing as an element of doping control in sport

4. Beyond Humanity?

5. Coping with Doping

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ethical discourses for and against doping in sport philosophy;Journal of the Philosophy of Sport;2024-07-03

2. Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates previously reported for two major international sport events in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature;Frontiers in Sports and Active Living;2022-12-05

3. Doping und Enhancement im Sport;Sport;2022

4. Understanding and building clean(er) sport together: Community-based participatory research with elite athletes and anti-doping organisations from five European countries;Psychology of Sport and Exercise;2021-07