Rating the Valence of Media Content about Electronic Cigarettes Using Crowdsourcing: Testing Rater Instructions and Estimating the Optimal Number of Raters-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Rating the Valence of Media Content about Electronic Cigarettes Using Crowdsourcing: Testing Rater Instructions and Estimating the Optimal Number of Raters

Published:2019-12-13 Issue:4 Volume:36 Page:497-507
ISSN:1041-0236
Container-title:Health Communication
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Communication

Author:

Lee Stella Juhyun¹²^ORCID,Liu Jiaying³,Gibson Laura A.⁴,Hornik Robert C.⁵

Affiliation:

1. TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University

2. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Population Sciences Division, Center for Community-Based Research

3. Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia

4. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine

5. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Communication,Health (social science)

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10410236.2019.1700882

Reference41 articles.

1. Campaigns and counter campaigns: reactions on Twitter to e-cigarette education

2. Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data

3. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk

4. 2 x 2 Kappa Coefficients: Measures of Agreement or Association

5. Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through Crowdsourced Content Analysis

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Valence of Media Coverage About Electronic Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products From 2014 to 2017: Evidence From Automated Content Analysis;Nicotine & Tobacco Research;2020-05-19