Affiliation:
1. University of Sussex, Brighton
Abstract
Subjects performed a memory task on two occasions, one in the morning and the other in the afternoon. The task comprised two components, one involved immediate recall of sequences of nine digits, the other involved the repeated item technique devised by Hebb (1961), in which one nine-digit sequence is surreptitiously repeated, each repetition being separated by two non-repeated sequences. Performance on the immediate memory task was better in the morning than the afternoon. The repeated item was recalled more accurately than non-repeated items, but this effect was not influenced by time of day. An explanation in terms of the relationship between arousal and memory reported by Kleinsmith and Kaplan (1963) is suggested.
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献