Complications associated with PEAK PlasmaBlade from 2010 to 2020 from MAUDE-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Complications associated with PEAK PlasmaBlade from 2010 to 2020 from MAUDE

Published:2022-05-19 Issue:5 Volume:35 Page:615-620
ISSN:0899-8280
Container-title:Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings
language:en
Short-container-title:Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings

Author:

Lee Esther¹²,Elzomor Amir¹,Boulos Sameh¹,Silva Olivia¹,Pasick Luke J.³,Benito Daniel A.¹,Tong Jane⁴,Zapanta Philip¹,Joshi Arjun S.¹,Goodman Joseph F.¹,Thakkar Punam G.¹

Affiliation:

1. Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia

2. College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California

3. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

4. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08998280.2022.2075686

Reference16 articles.

1. Electrosurgery: History, Principles, and Current and Future Uses

2. Comparative analysis on the effect of low‐thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade) vs conventional electrosurgery in post‐bariatric abdominoplasty: A retrospective randomised clinical study

3. Plasma Technology Reduces Blood Loss in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

4. Comparative Healing of Surgical Incisions Created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, Conventional Electrosurgery, and a Scalpel