Using Knowledge Construction Theory to Evaluate Learning Processes: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Showing Gradually Built-up Concept Maps Alongside a Scientific Text-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Using Knowledge Construction Theory to Evaluate Learning Processes: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Showing Gradually Built-up Concept Maps Alongside a Scientific Text

Published:2023-12-26 Issue: Volume: Page:1-17
ISSN:1044-7318
Container-title:International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
language:en
Short-container-title:International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Author:

Disch Leonie¹^ORCID,Fessl Angela¹²^ORCID,Franza Simone¹²^ORCID,Kimmerle Joachim³⁴^ORCID,Pammer-Schindler Viktoria²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Know-Center GmbH, Research Center for Data-Driven Business & Big Data Analytics, Graz, Austria

2. Technical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

3. Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany

4. Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Funder

Austrian Federal Ministry

Austrian Research Promotion Agency

Province of Styria

European Commission

Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology

Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth

State of Styria

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10447318.2023.2289296

Reference77 articles.

1. Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. In R. E. Mayer & P. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 522–560). Routledge.

2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory (reissued ed.). Waveland Press.

3. American Psychological Association (2018 April). APA dictionary of psychology . Retrieved September 6 2023 from https://dictionary.apa.org/

4. Type I Error Inflation in the Presence of a Ceiling Effect

5. How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate