The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy in China: Field Philosophical Questioning-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy in China: Field Philosophical Questioning

Published:2020-10-01 Issue:4 Volume:35 Page:379-392
ISSN:0269-1728
Container-title:Social Epistemology
language:en
Short-container-title:Social Epistemology

Author:

Yan Ping¹^ORCID,Mitcham Carl²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Marxism Studies, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

2. School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Center for Science & Technology Evaluation

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02691728.2020.1752842

Reference57 articles.

1. 南方科技大学官网, https://www.sustech.edu.cn/en/about.html?lang=en Accessed 2019-10-15

2. 漩涡中的“基因狂人”贺建奎(‘Gene Madman’ He Jiankui in the Whirlpool’), 新京报 (The Beijing News), 2018-11-28, 22:13, https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1618387651830885798&wfr=spider&for=pc Accessed 2019-07-14

3. 为什么我们反对“基因编辑婴儿”？真相比你想象中更可怕 (Why Do We Oppose ‘Gene-Edited Babies’? The Truth is Really More Scarier than You Think), 重庆晨报 (Chongqing News), 2018-11-30, 10:20:40, Resource: 生命时报 (Life Times), https://www.cqcb.com/yangsheng/2018-11-30/1273056_pc.html056 Accessed 2019-03-13

4. 贺建奎的博客 (He Jiankui’s Blog), 人类胚胎基因编辑的安全性尚待解决 (The Safety of Genome Editing in Human Embryos Remains to be Determined), 2017-02-19, 21:30, http://blog.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=514529&do=blog&id=1034671 Accessed 2019-07-13

5. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=32758 Accessed 2019-07-2

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The conceptual evolution of responsible research and innovation in China: a systematic literature review;Journal of Responsible Innovation;2023-01-02

2. The Gene-Edited Babies Controversy: Reactions in the Scientific Community, Social Media, and the Press;Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology;2023

3. Comparison of public discussions of gene editing on social media between the United States and China;PLOS ONE;2022-05-02

4. Taking Responsible Innovation to China: The Dalian Port Development Case;Science and Engineering Ethics;2022-01-05

5. The Geographies and Politics of Gene Editing: Framing Debates Across Seven Countries;Frontiers in Political Science;2021-10-25