Policy, Structural Change and Quality of Psychiatric Services in Australia: The Views of Psychiatrists

Author:

Rey Joseph12,Walter Garry34,Giuffrida Michael5

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Psychological Medicine, Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney

2. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Northern Sydney Health, North Ryde, NSW, Australia

3. Thomas Walker Hospital (‘Rivendell’) and Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health Services, Central Sydney Area Health Service, Concord West, NSW

4. University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Westmead-Cumberland Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Objective: Given that 10 years have elapsed since the implementation of Australia's National Mental Health Strategy, the aim of the paper was to ascertain the views of the country's psychiatrists about changes in mental health services. Methods: A survey was mailed to all Fellows of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists living in Australia; 1039 out of 2059 (50%) returned the questionnaire. Results: Private care has not changed much in the last 5 years, but the quality in public psychiatric services has deteriorated. While 67% of private practitioners, 46% of psychiatrists with mixed practice, 39% of exclusively public psychiatrists and 27% of academics believed public practice had deteriorated, only 18% of psychiatrist administrators believed that to be the case. Daily or weekly problems admitting patients to hospital was reported by 40% of psychiatrists working in the public system. Public psychiatrists believed that they now treat more patients who are more disturbed, more acute and more demanding. However, they see their patients less often, provide less psychotherapy and use more medication. Administrative demands have increased. Conclusions: According to psychiatrists, implementation of the National Mental Health Strategy has not yet resulted in better psychiatric care in the public health system.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3