Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference33 articles.
1. Siddiqi NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:44–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.00000000000000570.
2. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD012079. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.
3. Shah HN, Badlani GH. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: a systematic review. Ind J Urol. 2012;28:129–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.98453.
4. FDA Public Health Notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Webcache 14 February 2020 https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/urogynecologic-surgical-mesh-implants/fdas-activities-urogynecologic-surgical-mesh Accessed 17 June 2021.
5. Diwadkar Gouri B, Barber Matthew D, Benjamin F, Christopher M, Eric Jelovsek J. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(2 Pt 1):367–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318195888d.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献