Prognostic factors among patients with pathological Grade Group 5 prostate cancer based on robot-associated radical prostatectomy specimens from a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prognostic factors among patients with pathological Grade Group 5 prostate cancer based on robot-associated radical prostatectomy specimens from a large Japanese cohort (MSUG94)

Published:2024-03-14 Issue:1 Volume:42 Page:
ISSN:1433-8726
Container-title:World Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:World J Urol

Author:

Sasaki Takeshi,Ebara Shin,Tatenuma Tomoyuki,Ikehata Yoshinori,Nakayama Akinori,Kawase Makoto,Toide Masahiro,Yoneda Tatsuaki,Sakaguchi Kazushige,Teishima Jun,Makiyama Kazuhide,Kitamura Hiroshi,Saito Kazutaka,Koie Takuya,Koga Fumitaka,Urakami Shinji,Inoue Takahiro

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-024-04864-y.pdf

Reference26 articles.

1. Ciezki JP, Weller M, Reddy CA, Kittel J, Singh H, Tendulkar R, Stephans KL, Ulchaker J, Angermeier K, Stephenson A et al (2017) A comparison between low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation, external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation, and radical prostatectomy with or without adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 97:962–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.014

2. Campbell JM, Raymond E, O’Callaghan ME, Vincent AD, Beckmann KR, Roder D, Evans S, McNeil J, Millar J, Zalcberg J et al (2017) Optimum tools for predicting clinical outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of prognostic accuracy and validity. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15:e827–e834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2017.06.001

3. Garg H, Dursun F, Alsayegh F, Wang H, Wu S, Liss MA, Kaushik D, Svatek RS, Mansour AM (2023) Revisiting current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk prostate cancer stratification: a National Cancer Database analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 14:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00621-7

4. Wilkins LJ, Tosoian JJ, Reichard CA, Sundi D, Ranasinghe W, Alam R, Schwen Z, Reddy C, Allaf M, Davis JW et al (2021) Oncologic outcomes among Black and White men with grade group 4 or 5 (Gleason score 8–10) prostate cancer treated primarily by radical prostatectomy. Cancer 127:1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33419

5. Panunzio A, Sorce G, Hoeh B, Hohenhorst L, Tappero S, Nimer N, Rajwa P, Tian Z, Terrone C, Chun FKH et al (2023) Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4–5. Prostate 83:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24458

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prostate cancer screening; empirical clinical practice conducted for 70 years;World Journal of Urology;2024-07-29