Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference7 articles.
1. Yang J, Song H, Zhan H, Ding M, Luan T, Chen J et al (2023) The influence of preoperative urodynamic parameters on clinical results in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia after transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00345-023-04656-W
2. Zhong P, Zhao YR, Qiao BM, Yang FJ, Zhu Y, Yang ZQ et al (2020) Comparison of two numerical parameters to assess detrusor contractility in prognosing short-term outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate. Urol Int 104:361–366
3. Nunzio CDE, Lombardo R, Nacchia A, Deroma M, Alkhatatbeh H, Brassetti A et al (2018) Young academic urologists’ benign prostatic obstruction nomogram predicts clinical outcome in patients treated with transurethral resection of prostate: an Italian cohort study. Minerva Urol Nefrol 70:211–217
4. De Nunzio C, Franco A, Lombardo R, Baldassarri V, Borghesi A, Li Marzi V et al (2021) Phamacological treatment of persistant lower urinary tract symptoms after a transurethral resection of the prostate is predictive of a new surgical treatment: 10 years follow-up study. Neurourol Urodyn 40:722–727
5. Abou Zeinab M, Kaviani A, Ferguson E, Beksac AT, Schwen Z, Gill B et al (2022) Single-port transvesical versus open simple prostatectomy: a perioperative comparative study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 26:538–542