Direct in-scope suction: an in vitro evaluation of a single use flexible ureteroscope with integrated suction capability-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Direct in-scope suction: an in vitro evaluation of a single use flexible ureteroscope with integrated suction capability

Published:2024-09-01 Issue:1 Volume:42 Page:
ISSN:1433-8726
Container-title:World Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:World J Urol

Author:

Madden Aideen^ORCID,Altez Carlos^ORCID,Lueza Jordi Peña^ORCID,Popescu Răzvan-Ionut^ORCID,Cabrera Johan^ORCID,Corrales Mariela^ORCID,Traxer Olivier^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-024-05203-x.pdf

Reference29 articles.

1. Solano C, Corrales M, Panthier F, Candela L, Doizi S, Traxer O (2023) Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios. World J Urol 41(10):2627–2636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04487-9

2. Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C (2022) Thulium fibre laser versus holmium: YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 82(1):73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027

3. Solano C, Chicaud M, Kutchukian S, Candela L, Corrales M, Panthier F, Doizi S, Traxer O (2023) Optimizing outcomes in flexible ureteroscopy: a narrative review of suction techniques. J Clin Med 12(8):2815. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082815

4. Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL, Wang AQ, Knudsen BE, Yong C, Marien T, Miller NL, Krambeck AE, Charchenko C, Humphreys MR (2016) Natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of asymptomatic residual stone fragments after ureteroscopy: a report from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol 195(4 Pt 1):982–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.009

5. Brain E, Geraghty RM, Lovegrove CE, Yang B, Somani BK (2021) Natural history of post-treatment kidney stone fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 206(3):526–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001836