The hidden influence: exploring presence in human-synthetic interactions through ghostbots

Author:

McStay AndrewORCID

Abstract

AbstractPresence is a palpable sense of space, things and others that overlaps with matters of meaning, yet is not reducible to it: it is a dimension of things that hides in plain sight. This paper is motivated by observations that (1) presence is under-appreciated in questions of modern and nascent human-synthetic agent interaction, and (2) that presence matters because it affects and moves us. The paper’s goal is to articulate a multi-faceted understanding of presence, and why it matters, so the importance of presence may be readily understood by those who regulate media, digital and artificial intelligence (AI) industries. Novel forms of presence raise all sorts of questions of what it means to live with new forms of presences. Some of these are highly positive and others are resistant to simplistic moral diagnosis, a point explored through extended consideration of ‘thanatechnology’ and ‘ghostbots’. To clarify and foreground presence, this paper draws on continental philosophy and technologist ideas about presence to understand the significance and parameters of presence. It then puts these to work by considering a range of existing and emerging human-synthetic agent interactions, arguing that that presence is an underappreciated yet crucial factor in human-synthetic interactions, particularly involving AI and ghostbots. The paper concludes with points of focus for organisations charged with media, data protection and AI governance regarding facets of presence-based characteristics for emergent human-synthetic interaction. Foremost is consideration of open standards for a presence-based afterlife and suggestion of a temporal firewall, or a break of time before resurrection, to prevent harm to those who have recently lost someone.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference66 articles.

1. Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community. University of Minnesota Press.

2. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.

3. Bakir, V., Laffer, A., & McStay, A. (2023). Blurring the moral limits of data markets: Biometrics, emotion and data dividends. AI & Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01739-5.

4. Bassett, D. J. (2022). The future of digital death. The Creation and Inheritance of Digital Afterlives. Palgrave studies in the future of humanity and its successors. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91684-8_7

5. Basu, T. (2022). I just watched Biggie Smalls perform ‘live’ in the metaverse, Technology Review. Retrieved October 12, 2023, from https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/16/1065393/biggie-smalls-metaverse/?.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3