Vicious Relational Circles and Chronic Couple Conflictuality: An Empirical Study

Author:

Eleonora FiorenzaORCID,Valeria Crisafulli,Renato Carpentieri,De Luca Emma,Di Filippo Clarissa,La Stella Michela,Jessica Leonardi,Camilla Mannocchi,Martina Rodomonti,Laura Rosi,Marianna Santodoro,Francesco Gazzillo

Abstract

AbstractThe study aims to empirically assess the control-mastery theory hypothesis that considers chronic couple conflictuality as the repetition of relational vicious circles—that is, interactions where both partners test their pathogenic beliefs and fail their reciprocal tests, confirming their reciprocal pathogenic beliefs. In addition, the study aims to verify if interpersonal guilt is more activated during couple conflicts. Our study involved 11 couples treated by four experienced therapists and nine trained, independent judges who, after reading verbatim transcripts of the couples’ psychotherapy sessions, used the Patient Scale of Couple Testing (PSCT), and the Patient Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale (PIGRS) to rate segments of couple sessions. The results were obtained by applying generalized estimating equations and confirm our hypotheses: we could observe a greater presence of testing activity and confirmation of pathogenic beliefs in segments classified as conflictual for both partners and a stronger presence of interpersonal guilt in conflictual versus nonconflictual interactions. These findings support the idea that conflict interactions can be seen as failed attempts by both partners to disconfirm their pathogenic beliefs.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Reference35 articles.

1. Bush, M. (2005). The role of unconscious guilt in psychopathology and in psychotherapy. In G. Silberschatz (Ed.), Transformative relationships: The control mastery theory of psychotherapy (pp. 43–66). Routledge.

2. Crenshaw, A. O., Leo, K., Christensen, A., Hogan, J. N., Baucom, K. J. W., & Baucom, B. R. W. (2021). Relative importance of conflict topics for within-couple tests: The case of demand/withdraw interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000782

3. Curtis, J. T., & Silberschatz, G. (2022). The plan formulation method. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (3rd ed., pp. 88–112). Guilford Press.

4. Elkaïm, M. (1997). If you love me, don’t love me: Undoing reciprocal double binds and other methods of change in couple and family therapy. Jason Aronson.

5. Epstein, N. B., & Zheng, L. (2017). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3