Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the performance of a commercially available Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) in describing and establishing differential diagnoses for radiolucent lesions in panoramic radiographs.
Materials and methods
Twenty-eight panoramic radiographs, each containing a single radiolucent lesion, were evaluated in consensus by three examiners and a commercially available ChatGPT-3.5 model. They provided descriptions regarding internal structure (radiodensity, loculation), periphery (margin type, cortication), shape, location (bone, side, region, teeth/structures), and effects on adjacent structures (effect, adjacent structure). Diagnostic impressions related to origin, behavior, and nature were also provided. The GPT program was additionally prompted to provide differential diagnoses. Keywords used by the GPT program were compared to those used by the examiners and scored as 0 (incorrect), 0.5 (partially correct), or 1 (correct). Mean score values and standard deviation were calculated for each description. Performance in establishing differential diagnoses was assessed using Rank-1, -2, and − 3.
Results
Descriptions of margination, affected bone, and origin received the highest scores: 0.93, 0.93, and 0.87, respectively. Shape, region, teeth/structures, effect, affected region, and nature received considerably lower scores ranging from 0.22 to 0.50. Rank-1, -2, and − 3 demonstrated accuracy in 25%, 57.14%, and 67.85% of cases, respectively.
Conclusion
The performance of the GPT program in describing and providing differential diagnoses for radiolucent lesions in panoramic radiographs is variable and at this stage limited in its use for clinical application.
Clinical relevance
Understanding the potential role of GPT systems as an auxiliary tool in image interpretation is imperative to validate their clinical applicability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. ChatGPT (2023) : Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ (accessed 30
2. Ocampo TSC, Silva TP, Alencar-Palha C, Haiter-Neto F, Oliveira ML (2023) ChatGPT and scientific writing: a reflection on the ethical boundaries. Imaging Sci Dent 53:175–176. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20230085Epub 2023 May 19. PMID: 37405199; PMCID: PMC10315235
3. European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2022) The role of radiologist in the changing world of healthcare: a White Paper of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 13 :100. Published 2022 Jun 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01241-4
4. White SC, Pharoah MJ (2015) Radiologia oral: Princípios E Interpretação, 7 edn. Mosby, St. Louis
5. Ruutiainen AT, Durand DJ, Scanlon MH, Itri JN (2013) Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight. AcadRadiol 20:305–311
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献