Author:
Huang Jiqian,Wu Zhijing,Quan Wei,Ye Xiaohua,Dai Xiaolong,Luo Jiangtao,Han Xiao,Li Xiaozhong,Zheng Wenjie
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Diagnosing juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is challenging. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of anti-α-1,4-D-polygalacturonic acid (PGA) antibodies in JIA, focusing on their role in diagnosis and assessing disease activity.
Methods
In this prospective case–control study, we examined variations in serum levels of PGA-IgA and PGA-IgG among children with different types of JIA and healthy controls. Serum PGA-IgA and PGA-IgG levels were assessed concurrently in children with active and inactive JIA.
Results
This study included 126 patients diagnosed with JIA, 13 neonates, and 76 healthy children. Serum PGA-IgA and PGA-IgG levels were assessed, which revealed significant differences in PGA-IgA levels between various JIA subtypes and controls. An analysis of PGA-IgA levels in various JIA states revealed a statistically significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated the robust predictive capability of PGA-IgA, with an AUC of 0.879 (p < 0.001), along with a specificity of 0.842 and sensitivity of 0.848.
Conclusion
Increased levels of anti-PGA antibodies, particularly PGA-IgA, were significantly associated with JIA. PGA-IgA may serve as a sensitive biomarker for disease activity in JIA and could potentially aid in the diagnosis of JIA.
Key Points• This study found a significant correlation between blood levels of PGA-IgA and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), which may provide valuable diagnostic insights.• PGA-IgA shows potential as a sensitive biomarker for the assessment of disease activity in JIA patients, helping to determine disease activity.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province
Basic Research Project of Wenzhou City
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Baum J, Bhettay E, Glass DN, Manners P, Maldonado-Cocco J, Suarez-Almazor M, Orozco-Alcala J, Prieur AM (1998) Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban, 1997. J Rheumatol 25:1991–1994
2. Mahmud SA, Binstadt BA (2018) Autoantibodies in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Immunol 9:3168.https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03168
3. Nigrovic PA, Raychaudhuri S, Thompson SD (2018) Review: Genetics and the classification of arthritis in adults and children. Arthritis Rheumatol 70:7–17.https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40350
4. Vehe RK, Begovich AB, Nepom BS (1990) HLA susceptibility genes in rheumatoid factor positive juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl 26:11–15
5. Monach PA, Hueber W, Kessler B, Tomooka BH, BenBarak M, Simmons BP, Wright J, Thornhill TS, Monestier M, Ploegh H, Robinson WH, Mathis D, Benoist C (2009) A broad screen for targets of immune complexes decorating arthritic joints highlights deposition of nucleosomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:15867–15872.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908032106