The Engagement Problem: a Review of Engagement with Digital Mental Health Interventions and Recommendations for a Path Forward

Author:

Lipschitz Jessica M.ORCID,Pike Chelsea K.,Hogan Timothy P.,Murphy Susan A.,Burdick Katherine E.

Abstract

Abstract      Purpose of the review Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are an effective and accessible means of addressing the unprecedented levels of mental illness worldwide. Currently, however, patient engagement with DMHIs in real-world settings is often insufficient to see a clinical benefit. In order to realize the potential of DMHIs, there is a need to better understand what drives patient engagement. Recent findings We discuss takeaways from the existing literature related to patient engagement with DMHIs and highlight gaps to be addressed through further research. Findings suggest that engagement is influenced by patient-, intervention-, and system-level factors. At the patient level, variables such as sex, education, personality traits, race, ethnicity, age, and symptom severity appear to be associated with engagement. At the intervention level, integrating human support, gamification, financial incentives, and persuasive technology features may improve engagement. Finally, although system-level factors have not been widely explored, the existing evidence suggests that achieving engagement will require addressing organizational and social barriers and drawing on the field of implementation science. Summary Future research clarifying the patient-, intervention-, and system-level factors that drive engagement will be essential. Additionally, to facilitate an improved understanding of DMHI engagement, we propose the following: (a) widespread adoption of a minimum necessary 5-element engagement reporting framework, (b) broader application of alternative clinical trial designs, and (c) directed efforts to build upon an initial parsimonious conceptual model of DMHI engagement.

Funder

NIMH

NIDA

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3