Tough Clinical Decisions: Experiences of Polish Physicians

Author:

Różyńska JoannaORCID,Zawiła-Niedźwiecki JakubORCID,Maćkiewicz BartoszORCID,Czarkowski MarekORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe paper reports results of the very first survey-based study on the prevalence, frequency and nature of ethical or other non-medical difficulties faced by Polish physicians in their everyday clinical practice. The study involved 521 physicians of various medical specialties, practicing mainly in inpatient healthcare. The study showed that the majority of Polish physicians encounter ethical and other non-medical difficulties in making clinical decisions. However, they confront such difficulties less frequently than their foreign peers. Moreover, Polish doctors indicate different circumstances as a source of the experienced problems. The difficulties most often reported relate to (i) patients (or their proxies) requests for medically non-indicated interventions; (ii) problems with communication with patients (or their proxies) due to the patients’ negative attitude, unwillingness to cooperate, or aggression; and (iii) various difficulties with obtaining informed consent. Polish physicians report difficulties associated with disagreements among care givers or scarcity of resources less frequently than doctors from other countries. The study’s findings provide support for the thesis that a significant portion of Polish physicians still follow a traditional, paternalistic, and hierarchical model of healthcare practice. Instead of promoting patient’s empowerment, engagement, and rights, they often consider these ideas as a threat to physicians’ professional authority and autonomy. The study leads to the conclusion that due to insufficient training in medical ethics, communication skills, and medical law, many Polish physicians lack the knowledge and competence necessary to adequately respond to challenges posed by modern healthcare practice.

Funder

National Programme for the Development of Humanities of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference59 articles.

1. Baker, R.B., McCullough, L. B. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge world history of medical ethics. Cambridge University Press.

2. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics, 8th edition. Oxford University Press.

3. Bremberg, S., & Nilstun, T. (2001). The variety of ethical issues in everyday practice interviews with Swedish GPs. European Journal of General Practice, 7(4), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814780109094333

4. Borowczyk, M., Chojnacka-Kuraś, M., Doroszewska, A., Jankowska, A. K., Kowalski, Z., Libura, M., Małecki, Ł., & Stelmach-Przygoda, A. (2021). Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Komunikacji Medycznej dotyczące kształcenia kompetencji komunikacyjnych na kierunkach lekarskim i lekarsko-dentystycznym [Recommendations of the Polish Society for Medical Communication about communication skills education for students of medicine and dentistry]. Retrieved November 18, 2021, from https://komunikacjamedyczna.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ConsensusPTKM2.pdf

5. Czarkowski, M., Różyńska, J., Maćkiewicz, B., & Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, J. (2021). Clinical ethics consultations in the opinion of Polish physicians. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18, 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10116-0

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3