National diabetes registries: do they make a difference?

Author:

Bak Jessica C. G.,Serné Erik H.,Kramer Mark H. H.,Nieuwdorp Max,Verheugt Carianne L.

Abstract

Abstract Aims The global epidemic of diabetes mellitus continues to expand, including its large impact on national health care. Measuring diabetes outcomes and their causes of variation highlights areas for improvement in care and efficiency gains; large registries carry this potential. By means of a systematic review, we aimed to give an overview of national registries worldwide by quantifying their data and assessing their influence on diabetes care. Methods The literature on MEDLINE up to March 31, 2020, was searched, using keywords diabetes mellitus, national, registry, registration, and/or database. National disease-specific registries from corresponding articles were included. Database characteristics and clinical variables were obtained. All registries were compared to the ICHOM standard set of outcomes. Results We identified 12 national clinical diabetes registries, comprising a total of 7,181,356 diabetic patients worldwide. Nearly all registries recorded weight, HbA1c, lipid profile, and insulin treatment; the recording of other variables varied to a great extent. Overall, registries corresponded fairly well with the ICHOM set. Most registries proved to monitor and improve the quality of diabetes care using guidelines as a benchmark. The effects on national healthcare policy were more variable and often less clear. Conclusions National diabetes registries confer clear insights into diagnostics, complications, and treatment. The extent to which registries influenced national healthcare policy was less clear. A globally implemented standard outcome set has the potential to improve concordance between national registries, enhance the comparison and exchange of diabetes outcomes, and allocate resources and interventions where most needed.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Endocrinology,General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference86 articles.

1. International Diabetes Federation Europe (2017) Integrating diabetes evidence into practice, p 34. Available from: https://idf.org/our-activities/advocacy-awareness/resources-and-tools/140-integrating-diabetes-evidence-into-practice.html

2. Williams R, Colagiuri SAR (2019) IDF diabetes atlas, pp 34–39. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/2019/IDF_Atlas_9th_Edition_2019.pdf

3. Richardson E, Zaletel J, Nolte E (2016) National diabetes plans in Europe what lessons are there for the prevention and control of chronic diseases in Europe?. Available from: www.nijz.si

4. Hoque DME, Kumari V, Hoque M, Ruseckaite R, Romero L, Evans SM (2017) Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0183667–e0183667

5. Thomas KG, Thomas MR, Stroebel RJ et al (2007) Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic—a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med 22(12):1740–1744

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3