The split ladder of policy problems, participation, and politicization: constitutional water change in Ecuador and Chile

Author:

Hurlbert Margot,Gupta Joyeeta

Abstract

AbstractThere is debate about whether complex problems should be addressed technocratically or whether they should be politicized. While many tend to favour technocratic decision-making and evidence based policy, for others politicization of policy problems is fundamental for significant policy change. But politicization does not always lead to problem solving. Nor is it always necessary. This paper addresses the question: Under what circumstances should problems be politicized, and what is the effect of such politicization? It adds politicization, through windows of opportunity, to the split ladder of participation to assess policy change through two case studies: successful and unsuccessful constitutional change in Ecuador (2008) and Chile respectively (2022). It argues that where there is no agreement on either science or policy, politicization is required to address lack of consensus in values, but constitutional protection is needed to protect minorities and the vulnerable, their access and human right to water. De-politicization stymies policy change potentially harming democracy. This paper argues for a citizen engaged exploration of the complex problem of climate change and its impacts on water, but a targeted politicization coincident with, but developed well in advance of, windows of opportunity. Moreover, policy framing correlated with complex problems continues to be a key consideration. Furthermore, alliances of disparate actors, elections of new political leaders and considerations of property rights and justice issues are paramount. Significant constitutional policy change reflects social learning, but subsequent court actions by policy entrepreneurs is required to effectively implement this change. Framing constitutional change to protect rights to water and effect international agreements (including the Warsaw International Mechanism under the climate change regime) advances water justice and may increase success.

Funder

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference114 articles.

1. A’I Kofan community of Sinangoe vs. Ecuador, (2022).

2. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente (Constitución Ecuatoriana del 2008). República del Ecuador: Montecristi, Ecuador, 2008.

3. Asamblea Nacional. (2014). Ley Orgánica De Recursos Hídricos, Usos, Y Aprovechamiento Del Agua; República Del Ecuador. Quito.

4. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking case study research. A comparative approach. Routledge.

5. Basco-Carrera, L., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., Benitez Avila, C. A., & Guntoro, F. P. (2017). Collaborative Modelling for Informed Decision Making and Inclusive Water Development. Water Resources Management, 31(9), 2611–2625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1647-0.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3