Perceived disrespectful treatment in low-income healthcare settings through the lens of intersectionality

Author:

Snitselaar Sara,Carr Deborah

Abstract

AbstractRace and gender differences in the quality of one’s health care encounters are widely documented, but few studies explore the multiplicative impacts of race and gender. Drawing on intersectionality frameworks, we contrast white, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American men’s and women’s perceptions of disrespectful treatment from health care providers and staff (e.g., receptionists, clerks) in low-income health settings. Data are from the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey (N = 5385), a nationally representative survey of community-dwelling patients receiving care at health centers funded through Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act. Our results show race and sex differences in the study outcomes, yet weak support for intersectional effects. Asian and Native American patients report more disrespectful treatment from providers, relative to other ethnic groups. Women are more likely than men to report disrespectful treatment from staff. Asians also report disrespectful treatment from staff. Health care providers and staff may require training focused on the distinctive needs of Asian patients, for whom “saving face” may be a salient goal. Structural changes to reduce wait times and employ medical interpreters to ensure clear communication, and staff training focused on verbal and nonverbal communication may mitigate against actions perceived as disrespectful in low-income health settings.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference66 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington: National Academies Press; 2003.

2. Williams DR, Mohammed SA, Leavell J, Collins C. Race, socioeconomic status, and health: complexities, ongoing challenges, and research opportunities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:69–101.

3. Marcum JA. Clinical decision-making, gender bias, virtue epistemology, and quality healthcare. Topoi. 2017;36(3):501–8.

4. Rapp KS, Volpe V, Hale TL, Quartaro DF. State-level sexism and gender disparities in health care access and quality in the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 2022;63(1):2–18.

5. Turan JM, Elafros MA, Logie CH, Turan SBB, Crockett KB, Pescosolido B, Murray SM. Challenges and opportunities in examining and addressing intersectional stigma and health. BMC Med. 2019;17(7):2–15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3