Crossing the principle–practice gap in AI ethics with ethical problem-solving
-
Published:2024-04-15
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2730-5953
-
Container-title:AI and Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:AI Ethics
Author:
Corrêa Nicholas KlugeORCID, Santos James WilliamORCID, Galvão CamilaORCID, Pasetti MarceloORCID, Schiavon DieineORCID, Naqvi FaizahORCID, Hossain RobayetORCID, Oliveira Nythamar DeORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe past years have presented a surge in (AI) development, fueled by breakthroughs in deep learning, increased computational power, and substantial investments in the field. Given the generative capabilities of more recent AI systems, the era of large-scale AI models has transformed various domains that intersect our daily lives. However, this progress raises concerns about the balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, safety measures, and financial interests. Moreover, using such systems in sensitive areas amplifies our general ethical awareness, prompting a re-emergence of debates on governance, regulation, and human values. However, amidst this landscape, how to bridge the principle–practice gap separating ethical discourse from the technical side of AI development remains an open problem. In response to this challenge, the present work proposes a framework to help shorten this gap: ethical problem-solving (EPS). EPS is a methodology promoting responsible, human-centric, and value-oriented AI development. The framework’s core resides in translating principles into practical implementations using impact assessment surveys and a differential recommendation methodology. We utilize EPS as a blueprint to propose the implementation of an Ethics as a Service Platform, currently available as a simple demonstration. We released all framework components openly and with a permissive license, hoping the community would adopt and extend our efforts into other contexts. Available in the following URL https://nkluge-correa.github.io/ethical-problem-solving/.
Funder
FAPERGS CNPq Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference134 articles.
1. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 25 (2012) 2. Sejnowski, T.J.: The Deep Learning Revolution. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018) 3. Corrêa, N.K., Galvão, C., Santos, J.W., Del Pino, C., Pinto, E.P., Barbosa, C., Massmann, D., Mambrini, R., Galvão, L., Terem, E., Oliveira, N.: Worldwide AI ethics: a review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. Patterns 4(10), 100857 (2023) 4. Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Ngo, H., Niebles, J.C., Parli, V., Shoham, Y., Wald, R., Clark, J., Perrault, R.: The AI index 2023 annual report. Technical report, AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, April (2023) 5. Falk, S., van Wynsberghe, A.: Challenging AI for sustainability: what ought it mean? AI Ethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00323-3
|
|