AI-produced certainties in health care: current and future challenges

Author:

Tretter MaxORCID,Ott TabeaORCID,Dabrock Peter

Abstract

AbstractSince uncertainty is a major challenge in medicine and bears the risk of causing incorrect diagnoses and harmful treatment, there are many efforts to tackle it. For some time, AI technologies have been increasingly implemented in medicine and used to reduce medical uncertainties. What initially seems desirable, however, poses challenges. We use a multimethod approach that combines philosophical inquiry, conceptual analysis, and ethical considerations to identify key challenges that arise when AI is used for medical certainty purposes. We identify several challenges. Where AI is used to reduce medical uncertainties, it is likely to result in (a) patients being stripped down to their measurable data points, and being made disambiguous. Additionally, the widespread use of AI technologies in health care bears the risk of (b) human physicians being pushed out of the medical decision-making process, and patient participation being more and more limited. Further, the successful use of AI requires extensive and invasive monitoring of patients, which raises (c) questions about surveillance as well as privacy and security issues. We outline these several challenges and show that they are immediate consequences of AI-driven security efforts. If not addressed, they could entail unfavorable consequences. We contend that diminishing medical uncertainties through AI involves a tradeoff. The advantages, including enhanced precision, personalization, and overall improvement in medicine, are accompanied by several novel challenges. This paper addresses them and gives suggestions about how to use AI for certainty purposes without causing harm to patients.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference107 articles.

1. Hatch, S.: Uncertainty in medicine. BMJ. 357, j2180 (2017)

2. Daniels, N.: Reflective equilibrium. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/reflective-equilibrium/ (2011). Accessed 13 Mar 2018

3. Daniels, N.: Justice and justification. Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)

4. Gross, M.: The unknown in process dynamic connections of ignorance nonknowledge and related concepts. Curr. Sociol. 55(5), 742–759 (2007)

5. Compte, O., Postlewaite, A.: Ignorance and uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York (2019)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3