Abstract
AbstractThere is growing political pressure for farmers to use more sustainable agricultural practices to protect people and the planet. The farming press could encourage farmers to adopt sustainable practices through its ability to manipulate discourse and spread awareness by changing the salience of issues or framing topics in specific ways. We sought to understand how the UK farming press framed sustainable agricultural practices and how the salience of these practices changed over time. We combined a media content analysis of the farming press alongside 60 qualitative interviews with farmers and agricultural advisors to understand whether the farming press influenced farmers to try more sustainable practices. Salience of sustainable agricultural practices grew between 2009 and 2020. Many of the practices studied were framed by the press around economic and agronomic aspects, and farmer respondents said the most common reasons for trying sustainable agricultural practices were for economic and agronomic reasons. The farming press tended to use more positive rather than negative tones when covering sustainable agricultural practices. Respondents used the farming press as a source of information, though many did not fully trust these outlets as they believed the farming press were mouthpieces for agribusinesses. Whilst a minority of farmers stated they were motivated to try a new sustainable agricultural practice after learning about it in the farming press, this was rare. Instead, the farming press was used by respondents to raise their awareness about wider agricultural topics. We reflect on the role and power given to agribusinesses by the farming press and what this means for agricultural sustainability.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference74 articles.
1. ABC. 2020a. Farmers weekly. ABC. https://www.abc.org.uk/product/2513. Accessed 19 Jan 2020.
2. ABC. 2020b. Farmers guardian. ABC. https://www.abc.org.uk/product/3076. Accessed 19 Jan 2020.
3. Adams, A., A. Harf, and R. Ford. 2014. Agenda setting theory: a critique of maxwell McCombs & Donald Shaw’s theory in Em Griffin’s a first look at communication theory. Meta Communicate 4: 1–15.
4. Ahchong, K., and R. Dodds. 2012. Anthropogenic climate change coverage in two Canadian newspapers, the Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail, from 1988 to 2007. Environmental Science and Policy 15: 48–59.
5. Alskaf, K., D.L. Sparkes, S.J. Mooney, S. Sjögersten, and P. Wilson. 2020. The uptake of different tillage practices in England. Soil Use and Management 36: 27–44.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献