Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to report our early experience treating paediatric pelvic fractures (PPF) surgically, reporting on indications, outcomes, and complications.
Methods
Patients aged 0–15 with PPF treated surgically at a level I trauma centre were included prospectively between 2016 and 2018. Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification system. Functional evaluation was performed using a modification of the Majeed functional scoring system. Radiological evaluation of vertical and posterior displacement was performed according to Matta and Tornetta criteria and the method described by Keshishyan et al. for assessing pelvic rotational asymmetry.
Results
We included 45 patients (77.8% males and 22.2% females), with a mean age of 9.53 ± 3.63 and 19.87 ± 8.84 months of mean follow-up. The functional outcome was excellent in 42 (93.3%) patients, good in two (4.4%), and fair in one (2.2%). Radiologically, the vertical displacement improved from 5.91 ± 4.64 to 3.72 ± 2.87 mm (p-value 0.065), the posterior displacement improved from 7.87 ± 8.18 to 5.33 ± 13.4 mm (p-value 0.031), and the symphyseal diastasis improved from 9.88 ± 7.51 mm to 7.68 ± 3.18 mm (p-value 0.071). Residual pelvic asymmetry improved from 1.2 ± 0.61 to 0.8 ± 0.7 (p-value 0.001). Complications occurred in 21 (46.7%) patients, 11 (24.4%) pin tract infection, six (13.3%) limb length discrepancy, two (4.4%) prominent metals, one (2.2%) subcutaneous haematoma, one (2.2%) infected ISS.
Conclusions
We achieved acceptable functional and radiological outcomes after surgically treating a group of patients with PPF, which was relatively safe with minimal complications. The proper approach and fracture fixation tool should be tailored according to the fracture classification and the presence of associated injuries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference39 articles.
1. Mulder MB, Maggart MJ, Yang WJ, Perez EA, Namias N, Sola JE, Proctor KG, Thorson CM (2019) Outcomes of pediatric pelvic fractures: a level I trauma center’s 20-year experience. J Surg Res 243:515–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.011
2. Hermans E, Cornelisse S, Biert J, Tan E, Edwards M (2017) Paediatric pelvic fractures: how do they differ from adults? J Child Orthop 11:49–56
3. Gansslen A, Hildebrand F, Heidari N, Weinberg AM (2012) Pelvic ring injuries in children. Part I: Epidemiology and primary evaluation. A review of the literature. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 79:493–498
4. Eisa A, Farouk O, Mahran DG, Badran M, Abdelnasser MK, Samir M, Kalampoki V, Hurtado-Chong A, Rometsch E, Mohamedean A, Adam F (2019) Predictors of mortality after pelvic fractures: a retrospective cohort study from a level one trauma centre in Upper Egypt. Int Orthop 43:2405–2413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4230-2
5. Guillaume JM, Pesenti S, Jouve JL, Launay F (2020) Pelvic fractures in children (pelvic ring and acetabulum). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 106:S125–S133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献