Author:
Xia Mengting,Shi Xiaojun,Wang Jiaxi,Mao Peiyu,Mei Shanshan,Wang Xinyan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Yasutoshi Y, Tomoka O, Shiho O et al (2023) Pelvic reconstruction in abdominal trachelectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for occult uterine endometrial cancer found in specimens removed in the context of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Hinyokika Kiyo 69(4):117–120
2. Saeed A, Jawaher A (2023) Al Baalharith Maha, Outcomes of pregnancy and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with uterine preservation: a retrospective case-series study. Cureus 15:e37874
3. Hirotaka S, Shota O, Hirokazu A et al (2023) Medium-term risk of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse within 2-year follow-up after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 12:38–43
4. Burak K, Barış M, Ceyda K et al (2023) McCall culdoplasty vs. vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of advanced uterine prolapse: a randomized controlled study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 62(2):325–329
5. Bernard N, Zdenek R, Wael A et al (2023) Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) on sexual function in women with advanced stages of pelvic organ prolapse (POP): A five-year prospective study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 284:12–15