The clash between physical and digital realm: hybrid movement training during the pandemic

Author:

Serdar Bilge

Abstract

AbstractThis article is based on ethnographic research conducted in one of the physical training institutions that offer the Laban/Bartenieff Movement Studies (LBMS) certification program in 2021. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, the training was held in a hybrid format in which some participants were in the studio while others were attending remotely via Zoom. Zoom-mediated movement training for long hours revealed how the intervention of telematic technologies challenged practitioners’ sensorial experience and sense-making process. Moreover, bringing co-located and remote participants’ experiences together in the hybrid setting disclosed different modes of interaction dynamics in the studio and online. Overall, participants described their hybrid experience as a clash. In the article, starting from unfolding those clashes from the enactive perspective, I discuss how remote intercorporeality through an audio–video streaming system, Zoom, challenges participants’ sensorial experience and how remote interaction affects the shared sense-making process in the hybrid format setting.

Funder

Erasmus Mundus Choreomundus: International Master in Dance Knowledge, Practice and Heritage program

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference32 articles.

1. European Dancehouse Network. 2019. https://www.ednetwork.eu/. Accessed 14 May 2022.

2. Fol M. Virtualised dance? Digital shifts in artistic practices. EDN; 2021. https://www.ednetwork.eu/page/resources/ednpublications. Accessed 14 May 2022

3. Serdar B. Digital intervention into dramaturgical thoughts:The dramaturgy of remote dance improvisation. Proc CARPA8. Helsinki: Nivel 21 Publication Series of the Theatre Academy, University of the Arts Helsinki; 2024. Accessed 03 Apr 2024 https://nivel.teak.fi/carpa8/digital-intervention-into-dramaturgical-thoughts-the-dramaturgy-of-remote-dance-improvisation/

4. De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E. Participatory sense-making: an enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2007;6:485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9.

5. Stewart J, Gapenne O, Paolo EAD. Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Illustrated. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3