Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
An emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy (EMLC) is commonly performed for all biliary pathology, yet EMLC can be challenging due to acute inflammation. Understanding the risks of EMLC is necessary before patients can make an informed decision regarding operative management. The aim of the present study was to compare rates of operative and post-operative outcomes between EMLC and elective LC (ELLC) using a large contemporary cohort, to inform the consent process and influence surgical decision making.
Methods
All patients who underwent EMLC and ELLC in one UK health board between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively from multiple regional databases using a deterministic records-linkage methodology. Patients were followed up for 100 days post-operatively for adverse outcomes and outcomes were compared between groups using both univariate and multivariate analysis adjusting for pre-operative factors.
Results
A total of 2768 LCs were performed [age (range), 52(13–92); M:F, 1:2.7]. In both the univariate and multivariate analysis, EMLC was positively associated with subtotal cholecystectomy (RR 2.0; p < 0.001), post-operative complication (RR 2.8; p < 0.001), post-operative imaging (RR 2.0; p < 0.001), post-operative intervention (RR 2.3; p < 0.001), prolonged post-operative hospitalisation (RR 3.8; p < 0.001) and readmission (RR 2.2; p < 0.001). EMLC had higher rates of post-operative mortality in univariate analysis (RR 10.8; p = 0.01).
Discussion
EMLC is positively associated with adverse outcomes versus ELLC. Of course this study does not focus on a specific biliary pathology; nevertheless, it illustrates the additional risk associated with EMLC. This should be clearly outlined during the consent process but should be balanced with the risk of further biliary attacks. Further studies are required to identify particular patient groups who benefit from elective surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference18 articles.
1. Miura F, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ et al (2013) TG13 flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20(1):47–54
2. Zhong F, Wang K, Tan X et al (2019) The optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. Medicine 98(40):e17429
3. Salman B, Yüksel O, Irkörücü O (2005) Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best management for biliary colic. Dig Surg 22:95–99
4. Agrawal R, Sood KC, Agrewal B (2015) Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Surg Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/349801
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2014) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Interventional procedures guidance [IPG508]. NICE
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献