Author:
Preukschas Anas Amin,Wise Philipp Anthony,Bettscheider Lisa,Pfeiffer Micha,Wagner Martin,Huber Matthias,Golriz Mohammad,Fischer Lars,Mehrabi Arianeb,Rössler Fabian,Speidel Stefanie,Hackert Thilo,Müller-Stich Beat Peter,Nickel Felix,Kenngott Hannes Götz
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Evaluation of the benefits of a virtual reality (VR) environment with a head-mounted display (HMD) for decision-making in liver surgery.
Background
Training in liver surgery involves appraising radiologic images and considering the patient’s clinical information. Accurate assessment of 2D-tomography images is complex and requires considerable experience, and often the images are divorced from the clinical information. We present a comprehensive and interactive tool for visualizing operation planning data in a VR environment using a head-mounted-display and compare it to 3D visualization and 2D-tomography.
Methods
Ninety medical students were randomized into three groups (1:1:1 ratio). All participants analyzed three liver surgery patient cases with increasing difficulty. The cases were analyzed using 2D-tomography data (group “2D”), a 3D visualization on a 2D display (group “3D”) or within a VR environment (group “VR”). The VR environment was displayed using the “Oculus Rift ™” HMD technology. Participants answered 11 questions on anatomy, tumor involvement and surgical decision-making and 18 evaluative questions (Likert scale).
Results
Sum of correct answers were significantly higher in the 3D (7.1 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) and VR (7.1 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) groups than the 2D group (5.4 ± 1.4) while there was no difference between 3D and VR (p = 0.987). Times to answer in the 3D (6:44 ± 02:22 min, p < 0.001) and VR (6:24 ± 02:43 min, p < 0.001) groups were significantly faster than the 2D group (09:13 ± 03:10 min) while there was no difference between 3D and VR (p = 0.419). The VR environment was evaluated as most useful for identification of anatomic anomalies, risk and target structures and for the transfer of anatomical and pathological information to the intraoperative situation in the questionnaire.
Conclusions
A VR environment with 3D visualization using a HMD is useful as a surgical training tool to accurately and quickly determine liver anatomy and tumor involvement in surgery.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Shin DS, Ingraham CR, Dighe MK, Wang C, Vaidya S, Moshiri M et al (2014) Surgical resection of a malignant liver lesion: what the surgeon wants the radiologist to know. Am J Roentgenol 203(1):W21–W33
2. Bramhall SR, Gur U, Coldham C, Gunson BK, Mayer AD, McMaster P et al (2003) Liver resection for colorectal metastases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85(5):334–339
3. Jaeck D, Bachellier P, Guiguet M, Boudjema K, Vaillant JC, Balladur P et al (1997) Long-term survival following resection of colorectal hepatic metastases. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Br J Surg 84(7):977–980
4. Gobel T, Graf D, Hosnowsky C, Blondin D, Knoefel WT, Haussinger D et al (2017) Multimodal and sequential treatment improves survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Z Gastroenterol 55(3):251–259
5. Morise Z (2019) Developments and perspectives of laparoscopic liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today 49(8):649–655
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献