Abstract
AbstractIn mental health promotion, recovery is a process that leads to personal strengthening, control over crucial life decisions, and participation in communities through relevant professional, educational, or family social roles. Co-production, a key aspect of the recovery-oriented approach, emphasizes collaboration and active participation of people with mental health first-hand experience, family members, and citizens. Even though studies on co-production are limited and fragmented, there is evidence that co-production leads to positive outcomes, including improved well-being, empowerment, social connectedness, inclusion, and personal competencies. This study aimed to contribute to the limited literature on co-production in mental health by evaluating the co-production process in a non-profit mental health organization and its impact on empowerment processes and personal recovery outcomes. The research team adopted a collaborative approach and conducted qualitative research, including 13 individual semi-structured interviews and four focus groups. Results showed how the different dimensions of empowerment are promoted in and by the organization: (a) co-production processes supported empowered outcomes on an individual level, such as self-awareness; (b) the organization was perceived to promote empowering processes, such as a sense of safeness and protection; (c) co-production was a mean to build and maintain a network with mental health services that acknowledges the dignity and value of each subjectivity and promotes participation and recovery. Peer support workers were seen as facilitators of mental illness management, and the organization as a place for sharing mental health experiences and fostering individual recovery journeys.
Funder
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Baucke, C. L., Seifert, L. S., & Kaelber, K. (2021). Health co-inquiry in migraine: Online participation and stakeholder experiences before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Plos One, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260376.
2. Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The Challenge of Co- production: How equal partnership between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. (Discussion Paper) (p. 28). Camdencen: NESTA.
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport. Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
4. Carpenter, M., & Raj, T. (2012). Editorial introduction: Towards a paradigm shift from community care to community development in mental health. Community Development Journal, 47(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bss035.
5. Cattaneo, L. B., & Chapman, A. R. (2010). The process of empowerment: A model for use in research and practice. American Psychologist, 65(7), 646.