Abstract
AbstractRecent biological experiments (Lämmermann et al. in Nature 453(7191):51–55, 2008; Reversat et al. in Nature 7813:582–585, 2020; Balzer et al. in ASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 26(10):4045–4056, 2012) have shown that certain types of cells are able to move in structured and confined environments even without the activation of focal adhesion. Focusing on this particular phenomenon and based on previous works (Jankowiak et al. in Math Models Methods Appl Sci 30(03):513–537, 2020), we derive a novel two-dimensional mechanical model, which relies on the following physical ingredients: the asymmetrical renewal of the actin cortex supporting the membrane, resulting in a backward flow of material; the mechanical description of the nuclear membrane and the inner nuclear material; the microtubule network guiding nucleus location; the contact interactions between the cell and the external environment. The resulting fourth order system of partial differential equations is then solved numerically to conduct a study of the qualitative effects of the model parameters, mainly those governing the mechanical properties of the nucleus and the geometry of the confining structure. Coherently with biological observations, we find that cells characterized by a stiff nucleus are unable to migrate in channels that can be crossed by cells with a softer nucleus. Regarding the geometry, cell velocity and ability to migrate are influenced by the width of the channel and the wavelength of the external structure. Even though still preliminary, these results may be potentially useful in determining the physical limit of cell migration in confined environments and in designing scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Pharmacology,General Environmental Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Mathematics,Immunology,General Neuroscience
Reference86 articles.
1. Abercrombie M, Heaysman JE, Pegrum SM (1970) The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. 3. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res 62(2):389–398
2. Balzer EM, Tong Z, Paul CD, Hung WC, Stroka KM, Boggs AE, Martin SS, Konstantopoulos K (2012) Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes. ASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 26(10):4045–4056
3. Barnhart EL, Allen GM, Jülicher F, Theriot JA (2010) Bipedal locomotion in crawling cells. Biophys J 98(6):933–942
4. Beadle C, Assanah MC, Monzo P, Vallee R, Rosenfeld SS, Canoll P (2008) The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. Mol Biol Cell 19(8):3357–3368
5. Beneš M, Mikula K, Oberhuber T, Ševčovič D (2009) Comparison study for level set and direct Lagrangian methods for computing Willmore flow of closed planar curves. Comput Vis Sci 12(6):307–317