Abstract
AbstractThe traditional conception of immune function is that of a system which differentiates the organism’s own tissues (the self) from any foreign invaders (nonself), preserving the former by rejecting the latter. In a mammalian pregnancy, however, the immunologically foreign foetus is accepted by the gestator’s immune system. This presents a serious challenge to the self–nonself theory which has sometimes been called the immunological paradox of pregnancy. In this paper I shall defend the self–nonself theory against the critique posed by Thomas Pradeu. In addition I critically examine the alternative he proposes—the continuity theory. The main problem I will raise for any theory of immunology is that the phenomenon to be explained in pregnancy is the non-rejection of the foetus despite the triggering of the gestator’s immune system. I will argue that contemporary modified versions of the self–nonself theory can rise to this challenge but that continuity theory cannot. As such, the immunology of pregnancy gives us a good reason to favour contemporary self–nonself theory over the continuity theory.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Berbic, M., & Fraser, I. S. (2013). Immunology of normal and abnormal menstruation. Women’s Health., 9(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.2217/WHE.13.32
2. Beydoun, H., & Saftlas, A. F. (2005). Association of human leucocyte antigen sharing with recurrent spontaneous abortions. Tissue Antigens, 65(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.2005.00367.x
3. Burnet, F. M. (1969). Cellular immunology: Self and notself. Cambridge University Press.
4. Chaouat, G. (1993). The roots of the problem: ‘The Fetal Allograft.’ In G. Chaouat (Ed.), Immunology of Pregnancy. CRC Press.
5. Cohen, I. R. (1992). The cognitive paradigm and the immunological homunculus. Immunology Today, 13(12), 490–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5699(92)90024-2