Prevalence and correlates of restrictive interventions in an Irish child and adolescent psychiatric unit: a 4-year retrospective study

Author:

Haran MaeveORCID,Killeen David,Healy Mike,Brophy Peadar,Donohue Aoife,Whyte Imelda,Doody Brendan

Abstract

Abstract Background There has been a global effort to reduce the use of restrictive interventions (RIs) in healthcare settings. In order to reduce unnecessary RIs, it is essential to understand their use in mental health settings. To date, there have been few studies examining the use of RIs in child and adolescent mental health settings, with no such studies in Ireland. Aims The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence and frequency of physical restraints and seclusion and to identify any associated demographic and clinical characteristics. Methods This is a 4-year retrospective study of the use of seclusion and physical restraint in an Irish child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit from 2018 to 2021. Computer-based data collection sheets and patient records were retrospectively reviewed. Eating disorder and non-eating disorder samples were analysed. Results Of 499 hospital admissions from 2018 to 2021, 6% (n = 29) had at least one episode of seclusion and 18% (n = 88) had at least one episode of physical restraint. Age, gender and ethnicity were not significantly associated with rates of RI. Unemployment, prior hospitalization, involuntary legal status and longer length of stay were significantly associated with higher rates of RIs in the non-eating disorder group. Involuntary legal status was associated with higher rates of physical restraint in the eating disorder group. Patients with a diagnosis of eating disorder and psychosis had the highest prevalence of physical restraints and seclusions respectively. Conclusions Identifying youth who are at greater risk of requiring RIs may allow early and targeted intervention and prevention.

Funder

University College Dublin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Department of Health and Social Care (2014) Positive and proactive care: reducing the need for restrictive interventions. London: DHSC. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300293/JRA_DoH_Guidance_on_RP_web_accessible.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2023

2. Department of Health and Social Care (2019) Reducing the need for restraint and restrictive intervention. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-the-need-for-restraint-and-restrictive-intervention. Accessed 12 Jan 2023

3. Gaskin C (2013) Reducing restrictive interventions: literature review and document analysis. Victoria Department of Health. https://content.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/files/collections/research-and-reports/r/reducing-restrictive-interventions-literature-review-2013-pdf.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2023

4. Mental Health Commission (2014) Seclusion and restraint strategy. https://www.mhcirl.ie/sites/default/files/2022-09/Seclusion-and-Restraint-Reduction-Strategy.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2023

5. Mental Health Commission (MHC) (2022) Mental Health Commission 2021 Annual Report Dublin, Ireland. https://www.mhcirl.ie/sites/default/files/2022-07/MHC%202021%20Annual%20Report%20last.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3