Author:
Ray-Bennett Nibedita S.,Ekezie Winifred,Biswas Isha,Choudhary Nimra Iqbal,Cowie David,Dissanayake Lasith,Macleod Lauren,Nnaji Azukaeogo,Sahoo Madhulika
Abstract
AbstractSexual and reproductive health (SRH) services are crucial for women especially during disasters, to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity from miscarriages, unsafe abortions, and post-abortion complications. This study explored the SRH interventions provided during disaster response. A systematic review was conducted to identify what menstrual regulation (MR), safe abortion (SA), and post-abortion care (PAC) approaches/interventions exist to promote resilience in the health system in disaster settings; what intervention components were most effective; and challenges and opportunities to meeting SRH rights. Five electronic databases were searched, resulting in 4194 records. Following the screening process, seven publications were included. The intervention-related information in each publication was assessed based on availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality. Two SRH approaches/interventions were found. The effectiveness of intervention components could not be conducted due to the limited number of relevant studies. Challenges were found at facility and community levels, and opportunities included overcoming them, making MR, SA, and PAC integral to the mitigation phase, and policy change to overcome barriers related to unaffordability and inaccessibility. Recommendations are provided to encourage research and policy towards improving neglected SRH in disaster settings to realize Sustainable Development Goal 3 and the Global Strategy and Sendai Framework’s priority to promote disaster-resilient health systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Djafri, D., V. Chongsuvivatwong, and A. Geater. 2013. Effect of the september 2009 sumatra earthquake on reproductive health services and MDG 5 in the city of Padang, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 27(2): NP1444–NP1456.
2. Ekezie, W., N.S. Ray-Bennett, I. Biswas, D.M.J. Corsel, D. Cowie, A. Nanji, N. Choudhary, N. Goswami, and L. Dissanayaka. 2022. A systematic review of menstrual regulation, safe abortion and post abortion care adopted and implemented in “natural” disasters during response and recovery phase. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022353014. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022353014.
3. Every Woman Every Child. 2015. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health (2016–2030): Survive, thrive, transform. https://www.gavi.org/global-health-development/unsg-global-strategy?gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwgdayBhBQEiwAXhMxtq0z85oIHqVLhcSVldhwQ56jG_7yvuUmCNq17VgpSaZcEfoYdp9sshoCKV0QAvD_BwE. Accessed 25 May 2024.
4. Freed, B., S. Hillman, S. Shantikumar, D. Bick, J. Dale, and J. Gauly. 2021. The impact of disasters on contraception in OECD member countries: A scoping review. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 26(5): 429–438.
5. Gerdts, C., S.O. Bell, M. Shankar, R.T. Jayaweera, and O. Owolabi. 2022. Beyond safety: The 2022 WHO abortion guidelines and the future of abortion safety measurement. BMJ Global Health 2022(7): Article e009557.