Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the limitations of EU food law in safeguarding public health within ultra-processed food (UPF) markets, focusing on food additives as a case study. It critiques the EU’s reliance on macronutrient profiling and consumer informational regulation, arguing these approaches inadequately address systemic health risks associated with UPFs. By analysing current food additive regulations, the article maps out gaps in the EU’s food safety assessments, including the failure to consider cumulative and long-term health effects of additive consumption. It also shows how these risks are distributed unequally within structurally inequitable UPF markets, disproportionately burdening the most vulnerable consumers. The article critiques the EU’s focus on individual responsibility for dietary choices and calls for a reassessment of food safety standards to address structural risks and ensure equitable safety access within UPF markets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference149 articles.
1. Alemanno, A. (2013). Regulating lifestyles in Europe: How to prevent and control non-communicable diseases associated with tobacco, alcohol and unhealthy diets? Sieps.
2. Anklam, E., & Battaglia, R. (2001). Food analysis and consumer protection. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 12(5), 197–202.
3. Aparicio, A. A. (2013). Who is a ‘consumer’ on food law: Some reflections on the notion of consumer and the EU food law. Brill. Retrieved August 7, 2024, from https://brill.com/edcollchap/book/9789086867844/BP000075.xml
4. Avey, T. (2014). History in a jar: The story of pickles. PBS Food. Retrieved July 3, 2024, from https://www.pbs.org/food/stories/history-pickles
5. Bakker, D. J. (1999). Consumer behaviour and attitudes towards low-calorie products in Europe. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 85, 146–158.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献