Abstract
AbstractWe seem to learn and use concepts in a variety of heterogenous “formats”, including exemplars, prototypes, and theories. Different strategies have been proposed to account for this diversity. Hybridists consider instances in different formats to be instances of a single concept. Pluralists think that each instance in a different format is a different concept. Eliminativists deny that the different instances in different formats pertain to a scientifically fruitful kind and recommend eliminating the notion of a “concept” entirely. In recent years, hybridism has received the most attention and support. However, we are still lacking a cognitive-computational model for concept representation and processing that would underpin hybridism. The aim of this paper is to advance the understanding of concepts by grounding hybridism in a neuroscientific model within the Predictive Processing framework. In the suggested view, the different formats are not distinct parts of a concept but arise from different ways of processing a functionally unified representational structure.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Philosophy,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference78 articles.
1. Anderson, J. R., and J. Betz. 2001. A Hybrid Model of Categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8: 629–647.
2. Barsalou, L. W. 1990. On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. Advances in social cognition 3: 61–88.
3. Barsalou, L. W. 2016. On Staying Grounded and Avoiding Quixotic Dead Ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23 (4): 1122–1142.
4. Bastos, A. M., W. M. Usrey, R. A. Adams, G. R. Mangun, P. Fries, and K. J. Friston. 2012. Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding. Neuron 76 (4): 695–711.
5. Bloch-Mullins, C. L. 2018. Bridging the Gap between Similarity and Causality: An Integrated Approach to Concepts. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3): 605–632.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献