Abstract
AbstractIncreasingly, roboticists have to pay attention to cultural norms and expectations. But roboticists have generally worked with a relatively narrow understanding of culture, based on nationality. This contrasts with the rich and diverse understandings of culture from disciplines as diverse as sociology, philosophy, and anthropology. Here we draw on the philosophy of science literature on scientific terminology to argue that culture is a conceptually fragmented concept: the concept has no unified definition, and alternative definitions of culture are useful for different areas within robotics. We argue that this has important implications for robotics. We consider two possible reactions to this situation. One claims that, despite the lack of a unified definition, the concept of culture still fulfils useful roles within robotics, and ought to be preserved. The other argues that the problems with the concept are so great that the concept ought to be eliminated from discussions in robotics. We argue in favour of the former option.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Computer Science,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Systems Engineering,Social Psychology
Reference111 articles.
1. Adorno TW (1991) The culture industry. Routledge, London
2. Agar M (1994) The intercultural frame. Int J Intercult Relat 18(2):221–237
3. Alami R, Albu-Schäffer A, Bicchi A, Bischoff R, Chatila R, De Luca A, De Santis A, Giralt G, Guiochet J, Hirzinger G, Ingrand F (2006) Safe and dependable physical human-robot interaction in anthropic domains: State of the art and challenges. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp 1–16
4. Amariglio J, Resnick S, Wolff R (1988) Class, power, and culture. In: Nelson C, Grossberg L (eds) Marxism and the interpretation of culture. University of Illinois, Chicago, pp 487–501
5. Andreason R (2020) Conceptual fragmentation and the use of ‘race’ in scientific theorising. In: Marques T, Wikforss Å (eds) Shifting Concepts: the philosophy and psychology of conceptual variability. Oxford University Press, Oxford